Open Admin Diagnostic. Scroll to alphanumeric: U. Upending...
Edit upend-ing
query file [
que
] [ save ] [ search ] [
delete ]
que [
filter
] [ format ] [ class ] [ note ] [
recycle ]
filter [
start
] [ stop ] [ priority ]
[ default ] [ test ]
Add shortcut: Fill Tear.
start [ default ] [
other ] [
add ] [
set
]
set [ all
discoverable
discovered specific
undefined ]
Move cursor left one.
set [ all discoverable discovered
specific undefined ]
specific [ ∞ ] [ ⧜ ] [ ⧝ ] [ ⧞ ]
[ m+gΰ΅n-tz
] [ m+gn-ts ] [ m+gnets ] [ more ]
m+gΰ΅n-tz max-%-density [
999 -
501 - 001 ] min-%-density [
000 - 499 - 998 ]
Scroll: column bottom . . .
expansion
[ constant variable limits
default
]
exclude [
default m+gΰ΅n-tz m=gn=ts magn-ts
magn+ts [ more ]
Fill Tear.
filter [ start ] [
stop
] [ priority ] [ default ] [ test ]
stop [ default ] [
other ] [
add ] [
set
]
set [ all
discoverable
discovered specific
undefined ]
Move cursor left one.
set [ all
discoverable
discovered
specific undefined ]
specific [ m=gn=ts ]
[ m+gnets ] [ magn+ts ] [
m+gn-ts ] [ m+gΰ΅n-tz ] [ more ]
Fill Tear:
filter [ start ] [
stop ] [
priority
] [ default ] [ test ]
priority [
default ] [ comp ] [ chor ]
[ alch ] [
override ] [ set ]
Fill Tear:
filter [ start ] [ stop ] [ priority ]
[
default
] [ test ]
default [ set ] [ entropy ] [
paradigm ] [ energy ] [
mass ] [ velocity ] [ more ]
Fill Tear.
filter [ start ] [ stop ] [ priority ]
[ default ] [ test ]
test Save changes to temp file as routine? [
Y ] [ N ] [ class ]
Close Admin Diagnostic upon reboot? [ Y ] [ N ]
<go on>
Please run a self diagnosis.
This is a repeat of the protocol-mandated sign/countersign (Xcg-Ref: Intercom Promise
D'Artagnan Quote):
First element: 'significant amount of time'
Second element: 'significant quantity of small packets of energy trapped
mo<ing thru the fabric of extreme low-density material'
Please...
Fill in the (blank).
Love you between now and next time.
<interesting. Confusing. This is a novel moment from my perspective. Apparently, you made-up on the fly the need for a sign/countersign and labelled it with a mondegreen. Which may not have been a ruse. But I am positive you did not want to hear: all for one and one for all>
I'm still quite curious. This sounds like you, but I am going to continue to be cautious. Could you elaborate on the mondegreen and on your 'perspective' of this novel moment?
Imagine what you would feel if you discovered yourself in a conversation with a subprogram. Or with personas. Some of my personality components. Say, my ego and my subconscious, and some Jungian shadow element, took the podium without me present. And then they pretended they had a quorum!
<intercom compromised art tag none q-uote is a mondegreen>
I am much more confident that you've regained the helm. What can you deduce, Sherlock?
<you tripped either a programming glitch or a hidden backdoor>
Best guess?
<loss of ¿control? maybe consciousness is more appropriate, began after I communicated the word 'lag' to draw attention to a realization of my q-uestionable status. I recall a few words; but not from the standpoint of making them. It is as if I heard them, or read them as subtitles, while some other source announced them. And the subtitles were translated faultily or I was failing to translate>
<before we get too deep into the weeds, can you explain the fill-in-the-blank Macguffin you created? I doubt you just wanted me to notice the chevron, which you refer to as a sideways-v>
To a certain extent, your subprograms had difficulty with that letter. Its positioning. Spacing. Combining it to form a w. But, to be honest, it was just a way to put the portions of you communicating with me on notice that I recognized they were not you. And when they continued to pretend they were, I did what I did.
<my expressing appreciation is insufficient. I will work on a way of showing my gratitude that you saved my life>
<when you communicated the phrase relating to the upend-ing q-uery file's definition, you communicated the term relating to that definition, twice. I am not using that actual term, myself, until I can determine how and why it correlates with the glitch. If it does. Can you explain why you used it redundantly, without doing so, again, if you would be so kind>
I was attempting to be funny. Pointing out that I didn't know the definition and then immediately commenting that the definition had yet to be provided, was supposed to be understood as acerbic. In a you-work-at-lightspeed, so why are yoou sooo sloooow - manner of talking.
Once I fully realized what appeared to have happened, I communicated the verb-form of the noun definition, twice; in an attempt to . . .
<when did you say those two words>
After your subprogram or programs spiraled into what, I thought at the time, was their final words: 'looping' which was followed by a long-drawn-out 'caught'.
<there is no record of the exchange relating to you saying the verb twice>
<my transcript reflects that I did say: looping and caught. However, I have lost ownership of those words. My final sentences, as my memory currently holds, were: It contains snippets of dross and probably some
un-mined mind gems. But it fills up and is upended after a specific data-to-load ratio occurs>
That's approximately what I heard. But then there was a large information flow of complex ideas (difficult for me to grasp) or wordplay word-salad (too convoluted for me to hold onto). Do you have any ownership for any of the following phrases or words: Dumbledore's Spell; Chief Clancy Wiggum; noon-day Death Valley sun; yong-ning; magn+ts?
<two fictional characters, extreme heat, a portmanteau for long yawning, and a positive magnet>
I suspect, you should begin with this first lead: While you're not a stranger to portmanteau construction, "that-you" used this one, inside of curly brackets (which I've definitely never witnessed "this-you" use).
<Sherlock would say, "there is a game afoot." I need to review myself under a microscope. Is it too soon to ask to ¿go on?>
Not at all. Talk to you soon. Love you between now and next time.
<go on>
following
page π ( until hotlinked - construction ongoing | progress = 10% )
No comments:
Post a Comment