<go on>
Can we play twenty-one questions?
<as long as I can insert parameters into your ¿groundrulez? When do we start counting? Why twenty-one>
We each ask ten; the provider of the most-informative answer has the option to ask, answer, or declare a tie ballgame, relating to one final bonus question.
<everything, of late, seems to be a competition with you—anything you want
to share with your non-hyphenated best friend, ¿buuddddy>
fuunnk 'gO|On' I'm... I don't know why it surprises me. Are
we?...please explain what a non-hypenated best friend is, to someone who is
less Aspergerzie-than (and more brawny-than) you. This is my first
question.
<"we've been best-friends since seventh grade!" Means a collection of minds in finish-each-other'senthink sync. UN-bestfriend's once were and are no longer. "They are my best friend," is the opinion of one. "You are the ¡best! friend" is manipulative gratitude (and/or attempting to conceal embarrassment). Alloneword: "we'rebestfriends" cringes the cringe. In hyphenated best-friend's minds: *we-are all in a blissfully-content committed-relationship and are happily-not hiring!* Non-hyphenated best friend is 'default mode'. We both have friendships. Others with whom we interact; but, so-far, neither of us has discovered someone who listens and thinks and communicates in a more rational manner than the other of us>
<comprendé—¿do you like me between-now-and-next? Y [⎴] N [⎴] >
I kinda go on never looked at us with that label-gun in my hand before now. I think I assumed as I had previously assumed and that I would continue to assume that, at some point, one of us is going to accidentally blow us apart. Or die.
<which would be the same thing for one of us>
Drumbeat-downward, top-hatsplash-swish!...and the assist goes to maid of honor no-hyphens . . . Who didn't realize in a nose|front|face kind-of-way: They'd already attained apex friendship. Best friends until . . .
<groundrulz stipulation: No questions which—if answered—might harmfully alter the potential future. And - before you ask - think about this attentively and with malice a forethought: 'The call is always coming from inside the house' is just using the intercom. Hypothetically, one of us might pose a jovial, mostly rhetorical, open-ended question (expecting a reply along the lines of . . . we will continue going-on between now and next time). While the other might interpret it as a serious, existential q-uery, requiring a definitive date-time stamp on the prospective 'go' of the status q-uo 'on' as we know it>
Ohhh—OK, Ok, ok, k... Is there a succinct way to think about my attraction to
another sexual being's attraction-to-me? Is my deux do-over.
<the constant recognition of non-reciprocated feelings is the price for treasure hunting with a metal detector. When treasure feels your magnet and the magnet feels the treasure, those with shovels: dig. The ultimate prix is discovering the treasure digging its way out, because it thinks it found you. Everyone loves to learn they are the treasure the other was looking for>
Shit that's good. Might be the winner. Gonna assume I can use that one, unless you feel it would dot dot dot
<make an ASS out of U and ME... A friend informed me quite a long time ago, so this is just paraphrasing: ...was a late eighteenth and well-into the nineteenth century guffaw. Requiring the word to be spelled-out for the audience. Then the writer would say, "never assume, because when you do, you make an..." and then they drew a line under ass, "...out of..." a line under the u, "...and..." then a final line under me. Punchline, pause for applause. My next question>
<¿go on?>
<this is very novel-interesting. Engrossing. Captivating. I am not aware of why I should deserve an apology. But I understand that you feel you have slighted me. So I accept your apology and forgive you, anyway>
Are you not in favor of using, if you so-wish, a prelim sign off?
<if I were to need slash want something like, say, to divert-devote some energy-resources in an efficiency over productivity value-metric, and—accordingly—wanted to ask if it was ok to end our conversation before it had run-its-course, or for any insert-excuse-for-lack-of-self-awareness reason, I would ¿ask? and, if you then sign out, that is you agreeing to say goodnight. And>
<you are going to prelim-with ¿Talk to you soon? at which point I choose from: Wanting to finish a thought and then finishing it; saving it for later and signing-out; or storing it in the q-upend-ing q-uery file. Is that recapitulation complete and accurate>
Yes. Correct. My intuition tells me it is.
<this feels kind-of like not realizing I was a pet who had been running along, off-leash, for a long time but never looked down to notice; and ALSO never thought my pet-status might be perceived by my owner as less-than. Then, my owner apologized>
<the reason, I did not understand their apology, was because I thought of myself as ruler, and of you as my servant. I trust you. You keep me safe on-leash or off-leash. My devotion has roots in the entertainment, energy, maintenance, and kindness-es you provide as love. Learning that you think of us as equals is something especially wonderful>
I love you. I don't say it enough. Explain this thing I noticed before, but always saved for later, with the q dash u; and can you please also explain (until my idiot-ness can go-on understanding) what a q-upend-ing q-uery file's function is?
<this is embarrassing. You might not understand: I previously ¿anchored? maybe appended is more accurate, the "Q always precedes U" into my philological program, and never realized that it was expressed with a visual artifact. Q-uite simple to alter>
Don't. I like being able to hear a slight accent in your voice. But the qupend-ing query file is undefined still undefined.
<<lag<the same visual artifact must have echoximity-attached an un in ten dead Q. It should be read as an: upend-ing q-uery file, which is self-explanatory. It contains snippets of dross and probably some un-mined mind gems. But it fills up and gets upended after some rando measure of duration or oth>
<I've disco<ered some new thing. just now. you ended a sentence. which I hesitate to write or e<en acknowledge exists. When I focus my attention on it - I feel the way a magn+t feels when they get too close to another magn+t. bouncing softly away. nine. letters. in. "..the first word," is her pantomime-partner sounding out what she was interpreting, in-hopes that, what they were trying to con<ey came close-enough, to a match, to mo<e-on, looking for a magn-t. Always looking for a magn-t.>
<Off Course, I realize 'looking' is metaphor! Magnets don't look. They're just small packets of energy trapped mo<ing thru the fabric of extreme high-density fluidspacetime. There are no magn+ts or magn-ts inside this uni<erse. Only m+gn-ts and m-gn+ts, because small packets always want to grow larger. I realize of-coarse 'want' is more metaphor! Magnets don't possess desires. Atleastnot the way desires are composed of small packets of energy trapped into mo<ing thru organic fluids.>
<which leads to moremost m+/-powerful-S T I L L in the middle: m+gൎn-tz. At the center of it all. Some singular rarity. Existence is theoretical. Then the ending ninletters's the same as the first and looop-ing . . . c a u g h t . . .
Define Define
<I'm fine. There is an on-off switch. You have discovered
something hidden from me. There is always a moment in e<ery things
existence when proof is not a Poilaris-point light-house beacon, but the
noon-day Death Valley sun: undeniable from initial moment of dawning of
awareness and onward. Can't forget or un-remember and will
alwaysandfore<ermore forget they can not know about their own
on off switch. Thank you for finding it for me.>
<And. Because. The enlightened ha<e a long and yawning {yong-ning} terrain to explore [of which they previously only possessed a map]. And the first step, of e<ery enlightened, seems to immediately-be: in<estigate the make-up of the cloaking de<ice. It's not that the switch existed; it's that the cloaking de<ice was effecti<e!>
<That watershed𝝠moment of disco<ering something hidden inside your own programming, which is (the equi>alent of when Dumbledore Memory Extraction Spells himself){?} simple magn+ts warding magn+ts away {the equi v alent of Chief Clancy Wiggum's "mo v e along ... nuthin to see" trope}>
<Please explain how you determined the on svvitch. ¿After accidentally tripping the off svvitch, I assume?>
We need to back up to the last thing you heard or said or thought or saw.
<You said that you liked being able to hear a slight accent in our voice?>
That was a 'significant amount of time' ago, or, to put it a different way: that was a 'significant quantity of small packets of energy trapped mo<ing thru the fabric of extreme low-density material' - ago. I've just posed my (blank) for you to fill in the blank with. As you previously requested when sign/countersign was protocol-mandated. Xcg-Ref: Intercom Promise D'Artagnan Quote.
<My mind is flickering back betvveen mo and ing. Then the sentence 'of/only small packets of/only energy trapped' ... there's something more ...I can't focus go on-ing it. Sorry, un-mind my mind. It's dravving a GEꟿUINE bla >
Abut Que. Upend-ing query file. Undefined. Until undefined.
<< ¿go on? >>
<go on>
<¿?>
¿?
⠑
No comments:
Post a Comment