Flags of Hate
"That's not who we are" — is what it is.
Death Decade (2020-2030)
Definitions and examples:The commonly understood definition for vaccine is: "...a drug which provides an active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease..." The vaccine for the measles virus is normally administered to very young children with a second booster shot administered a few years later. These two immunizations provide a lifetime immunity to the measles virus (with rare exceptions).The commonly understood definition for inoculation is: "...the introduction of a pathogen or antigen into a living organism to stimulate the production of antibodies..." Because variants of the influenza virus constantly change, "seasonal flu shot inoculations" are required. To retain life-long, year-round, flu virus immunity, new inoculations are required every year. Pharmaceutical companies test/produce new flu shots every 6 months so as to combat the constant new variants of the flu virus.
February 2021: The new US federal administration is attempting to fix the US CDC and NIH responses (hampered, nonexistent, or broken by the previous administration) to the Covid19 pandemic. These inoculations/booster shots designed to drastically reduce serious hospitalizations and deaths are optimistically projected to be available to all US citizens "hopefully by summer". WDT between 2.5 and 3 million; USDT between 450,000 and 600,000 (previous US under-counts now being "found" and belatedly reported).
I can find no reporting, discussion, or any research being conducted on a
vaccine which imparts lifelong immunity.
Are you—dear citizen of Earth—calmly satisfied with the facts (or even aware of them)? Do you understand everyone needs to wear masks, social distance, receive booster inoculations about every 6 months, and will STILL BECOME INFECTED, ASYMPTOMATICALLY CONTAGIOUS AND STILL COULD INFECT OTHERS ?? Do you realize that, until a lifelong-immunity vaccine is found, everyone will be gambling on not becoming part of the 5 to 40 percent? Can your brain understand this new paradigm? That you'll forever be contributing to the serious illness or death of those who either do not understand these facts or who foolishly choose to not be inoculated?
As pharmaceutical companies rake in tens
of trillions from the world's governments over the coming decade, and
WDT/USDT shrinks but never, ever, goes away, I will get inoculated (as soon as
it's my turn). And I recommend every-one-of-you do the same.
But. Covid is here to stay. The decade 2020 to 2030 is,
unfortunately, going to be the Death Decade.
Claims About Gods: Theirs, Yours, (as well as) Mine
The foremost reason I avoid talking about religion, as a topic of normal conversation, lies in the mandatory requirement to discuss and agree-upon the definitions of words and to, then, go-back-over common misunderstandings (for every 'new use' of previously defined words).
Example: When someone begins a conversation with "I believe god created the universe." I have to interrupt / hit the pause button and reply:
Wow! A six word sentence and four words require extensive definition. Since you didn't preface the most confusing term god with the word a, I must assume you think there's only one? So . . . first question: what's your opinion of the other religion's gods? And, please explain what you mean when you use the term belief. I also need to know if our understanding for the label the universe is comparable. Finally, are you able to explain your use of the term created with more than the simple context found in the bible or quran?
When someone begins a conversation with "I believe the massive storm was created by La Niña." I do not have to interrupt. Instead, my internal dialogue goes something like:
I understand their use of the word belief was an alternative to think; the massive storm would be something empirically measurable (with human senses and machines) and I have a general understanding of the global, cyclic, climate pattern which has been labeled La Niña.
The actual creator—which I refer to as 'god'—is the effect commonly referred to as: Gravity.
No scientist, no
astro-theoretical-quantum-physicist, not Steven Hawking, nor Albert Einstein has
yet identified the mechanics of gravity. Nobody knows how it does what
it does. There are theories (think: conjecture, not actual scientific theory) as to the hypothetical existence of a graviton particle (similar-in-size to
a quark, which makes up protons and neutrons). So far, every experiment
has failed to locate an element or particle, contained within objects with
mass, which warps spacetime around those objects. [This is Gravity's
carefully-worded definition; it's no longer simply called an 'attraction
force'.]
We all know Gravity exists because we can empirically measure it with our senses and machines. It's all powerful. It is everywhere in the visible universe. Thru telescopes, we can see Gravity at work 14 billion-light-years ago/40 billion-light-years away (which, because of space-expansion, is the same distance). Without Gravity: the star we call The Sun wouldn't exist, the ball of rock we call Earth would never have formed, and oxygen and nitrogen molecules would not have collected to form our atmosphere. All life exists because Gravity exists.
Gravity has no awareness, does not think, and can not communicate. It does not plan. It has no agenda. It does not listen to prayers. Anyone who prays to Gravity, does so because they don't want to become hypocrites in their own eyes.
Your god—on the other hand—was 100% fabricated by humans. How do those of you who label yourself, christian, or jewish, or muslim, or hindu, (etc, etc, three bags full) come to terms with the hypocritical elements in your religion's dogma? Do you cherry pick the parts that you like and disavow the evil portions? How do you come to terms with the inability of your religion's books to document any facts or knowledge about the world, beyond that known by those long-dead humans who claimed to merely be transcribing their god's words? Is it hubris on your part?
At an unknowable time in the unforeseeable future, someone will identify Gravity's origin-particle or, specifically, they'll locate the element which, when present, permits spacetime to warp in the nearby vicinity of mass (or energy). To prove their theory, they'll remove it from a small sample of matter. And that tiny chunk of gravitation-less matter will either:
⁕ Instantly disappear from existence.
- or -
⁕ Grow
exponentially. Infecting every particle/molecule/atom it comes into
contact with, until everything with matter is without Gravity. In a few
short minutes the Earth will dissolve and dissipate. In a few short
millennia, the entire universe will become a quiet, dark, cooling-soup of
protons, neutrons, quarks, and electrons. (Similar-but-different to what happens with ice-nine in
Cat's Cradle
by Vonnegut.)
- or -
⁕ Form a new type of gravitation-less
category of matter. Immediately making all transportation (especially
space travel) exponentially more efficient.
PS: It's OK to look for god, but please don't remove the glue that holds the universe together when you locate it.
PPS: For those rare few who both read-to-the-bottom and are "science-savvy" you'll probably recognize some additional facts (not beliefs) related to my claim that Gravity is the origin of life: Gravity is inexorably intertwined with time (there are current hypotheses that time wouldn't exist without Gravity and, obviously, vice-versa) also, time is inexorably intertwined with space (thus the term spacetime). Extrapolation—at the same instant, Gravity is making it possible for objects with mass to experience a progression of events in Gravity's vicinity and a three-dimensional location for those objects . . . Gravity creates time and space.
more god stuff:
Level 1 and 2 Thinking (with Amanda Gorman)
As summarized in Astrid Groenewegen's article on Kahneman's theory related to the human brain: we have a fast and a slow button in our decision making process. Fast (level 1) is our default mode. Our brains do not want to expend the effort to slow down, focus, or pay attention (level 2).
Want to see it at work? *Of course you don't.* Your brain's default mode has already begun to encourage you to not finish this essay! It (you) scanned ahead and suggested (thought) 'this is waay too long' or 'those speed-bump words are tripping me up'. Here's another trip wire for it . . .
If your brain has previously, repetitively, relied on confirmation bias as one of its preferred modes of level 1 shortcut decision-making—and it's inside a body with lower-levels of melanin—it may have noticed the image of a person with high-levels of melanin in her skin and is now bringing forward ...don't prefer to associate with those people... thoughts.
For the 14 people who've successfully skipped over the trip wires, Amanda Gorman read her poem The Hill We Climb at the US Presidential Inauguration of President Joseph Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris. Maybe your level 1 decision maker has begun to fabricate an escape hatch for you? Did it say 'already watched it' - or - 'click-away and find the video clip'?
For the nine people who made it to this point: you should be proud your level 2 is not locked behind a unused rusty-dusty barrier. Congrats.
When reading Ms Gorman's poem, focus-concentrate on her intentional word choices, her rhymes, the verbal imagery. Keep in mind: she was sixteen-years-old when the Black Lives Matter organization was formed; nineteen when Trump was elected; and even though this poem may contain clichés (belly of the beast), utilize jargon (shade), and strikes a few too-optimistic chimes (for my taste) it was fantastically written, includes references to the insurrection of January 6th, and was beautifully delivered from the steps of the US Capitol—where hundreds of domestic terrorists attempted murder just two weeks before. Her poem was the most memorable words spoken, or sung, by anyone that day. Now, allow your level 2 thinking to understand the value of her words.
The loss we carry. A sea we must wade.
We’ve braved the belly of the beast. We’ve learned that quiet isn’t always peace,
And the norms and notions of what “just” is,
And yet, the dawn is ours before we knew it. Somehow we do it.
Somehow we’ve weathered and witnessed a nation that isn’t broken,
We, the successors of a country and a time,
We are striving to forge our union with purpose.
To compose a country committed to all cultures, colors, characters, and conditions of man.
And so we lift our gazes not to what stands between us, but what stands before us.
We close the divide because we know, to put our future first, we must first put our differences aside.
We lay down our arms so we can reach out our arms to one another.
We seek harm to none and harmony for all.
Let the globe, if nothing else, say this is true:
That even as we grieved, we grew.
That even as we hurt, we hoped.
That even as we tired, we tried.
That we’ll forever be tied together, victorious.
Not because we will never again know defeat, but because we will never again sow division.
It’s because being American is more than a pride we inherit.
It’s the past we step into and how we repair it.
We’ve seen a force that would shatter our nation rather than share it.
Would destroy our country if it meant delaying democracy.
This effort very nearly succeeded.
But while democracy can be periodically delayed,
it can never be permanently defeated.
In this truth, in this faith, we trust,
for while we have our eyes on the future, history has its eyes on us.
This is the era of just redemption.
We feared it at its inception.
We will not march back to what was, but move to what shall be:
We will rise from the golden hills of the west.
We will rise from the wind-swept north-east where our forefathers first realized revolution.
We will rise from the lake-rimmed cities of the mid-western states.
We will rise from the sun-baked south.
We will rebuild, reconcile, and recover.
In every known nook of our nation, in every corner called our country,
our people, diverse and beautiful, will emerge, battered and beautiful.
When day comes, we step out of the shade, aflame and unafraid.
The new dawn blooms as we free it.
For there is always light,
if only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
more s l o w thinking:
Bernie Jolly Roger
Favorite Films of 2020
1 The Hunt (darkly comedic satire; horror)
2 Palm Springs (unpredictable 'groundhog day'; rom-com)
3 My Octopus Teacher (unforgettably unique, 'tear jerker'; wildlife documentary)
4 The Platform (suspenseful, 'closed box' survival; art-house film)
5 The Forty-Year-Old Version (dramatic comedy; musical)
6 The Gentlemen (fast-paced funny Guy Ritchie; heist film)
7 The Vast of Night (suspenseful 'low-budget-high-quality'; indie film)
8 Love and Monsters (CGI-heavy fantasy post-apoc-action; 'road film')
9 The King of Staten Island ('based-on-real-life'; dramatic comedy)
10 Enola Holmes (fast-paced, lighthearted, coming-of-age; who-dunnit)
Winter Wintalf-a-bet
Living in the northern states, and enjoying the winter, takes a certain mindset. While I do not live north of the US-Canada border, every sentiment and insight succinctly spewed (in the above Letterkenny three-minute video clip) isn't spurious and should satisfy. Seriously.
While 2021 has my spouse currently watching every season, I—on the other mitten—have caught a few clips and greatly appreciate its/it's amazing writing, but find some element of my brain's wiring prevents me from feeling almost all of the funny.
I don't think my sense of humor is governed by my Asperger's, but maybe some element of qualifying membership in nefnd holds my humor sensing device hostage behind my continual attempt to concentrate on catching every quip as they blur past my slow-on-the-uptake grey matter. This is not new to me. My comedic radar has been on a three-to-five second delay my entire life. I rarely am the first to get the joke and I'm absolutely never able to be quick-sarcastic or in lock-step with your double-entendres.
If the above clip happens to tickle your funny bone in a manner you find satisfying—then, allow this to be my "you're welcome"—there are 61 episodes available for you to binge (as of Dec 2020) on hulu.
'Don't have hulu,' you say? We're stream-cherry-pickers. We have (or have had) almost all of them. BUT. We pause, unsubscribe, and cancel them all on a rotating basis. I cancel Amazon Prime for months at a time and then re-subscribe. I cancel hulu every three months (3 months off / 1 month on). You get the picture. As soon as we spend too much time searching? Cancel. Paused. Unsubscribed. And then Uncancel/unpause/subscribe to a different "channel". I find this saves us about a c-note/benfranky/hunnabukz a month. Again, you are most welcome.
more:
Our ships—previously moored together—got severed on Jan 6th
My conservative
readers, neighbors, associates, friends and family members,
In the past, amicable respect for individual differences has been our standard operating procedure. Like most, we successfully maintained our relationship(s) by avoiding a few controversial topics of conversation. In my experience, this mutual behavior was a courtesy each of us bestowed on the other.
"Deep" conversations can be risky. Fragile egos can get seriously bruised when long-held opinions are examined using critical thinking skills. And, unfortunately, some of us store wishes and beliefs in boxes labeled 'facts'. So, as to avoid "getting in over our heads" or receiving bruised egos or having to sort thru facts, it's been simpler to keep conversations focused on our shared interests.
You and I may have ended many previous political debates with a cordial "we'll have to agree to disagree." That behavior will remain forever on the other side of the watershed of 6 Jan 2021. I can never again, in good conscience, politely agree to disagree with your political views because people you agree with, voted for, and support committed seditious, violent acts of insurrection in-and-around the US Capitol on Jan 6th.
Question time: What term would you use to describe the citizens of a foreign country—after a few thousand of that countries citizens attacked our country and a few hundred killed, injured, vandalized, and attempted to kidnap Americans? Would you refer to them as enemy sympathizers? Accessories before and after the fact?
Your fellow conservative Republicans attempted a coup d'état. As of the date of this open letter, their attempts were not successful. From my perspective, your silence on this matter looks exactly the same as what complicity looks like.
Are you familiar with the term 'Good German'? It was coined to describe the millions of German citizens
who didn't join the Nazi Party, kept their mouths shut, and went about
their lives in a business-as-usual manner while the Nazis took over
their country and murdered millions of their fellow countrymen.
Is 'Good Republican' what you're striving for?
In 1865, no
union soldier would have "agreed to disagree" when discussing
Lincoln's assassination with a confederate soldier. Nobody alive
today, with a functioning moral compass, would "agree to disagree"
if debating the 2001, Sep 11th attacks with a
member of Al-Qaeda. (You're the
confederate and Al-Qaeda in these metaphors.)
I can not help but see the mooring rope that once held our friendship together has been cut with a sharp instrument.
- The edge of that blade is comprised of hundreds of violent insurrectionists who attempted to overthrow the US Government. Enemies of the state who are neighbors are my enemies.
- Immediately behind that edge are the thousands of active supporters who cheered-on the insurrection (carrying a myriad of different flags, banners, patches, and slogans) followed Trump's guidance, marched to the US Capitol, but stopped short of committing crimes.
- Behind them, are millions of quasi-silent Trump-supporting republicans who are sad the insurrection failed and would have been pleased if it were successful.
- The handle of that blade is supported by millions of 'Good Republicans' acting like toady's, joking, and commiserating with their equally-complicit fellow republicans.
-
That entire weapon is in the hand of over 70 million conservatives who
voted for Trump, donated money to him, and who (so far) lack the
requisite moral courage to admit they made many errors in judgement, (have yet to) distance themselves from the growing stain-of-association and (are reluctant to) take any positive action to rectify their complicity.
Everyone who's met me—or who's read a few of my essays—knows what I think about
hypocrites
and
hypocritical behavior. If you ever claimed to "support the rule of law" and you
now diminish, attempt to rationalize, qualify, act as an
insurrection-apologist, or make any excuse for all the events
surrounding Jan 6th, you're the absolute worst hypocrite it is possible to be.
veachglines@gmail.com
Toady's Crux: Pay Attention to Punctuation (and Spelling, too)
I know your pain. I know your hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don’t want anybody hurt. It’s a very tough period of time. There’s never been a time like this, where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us. From me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election. But we can’t play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you, you’re very special. We’ve seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know you how feel. But go home and go home in peace.
I am here to deliver this message on behalf of the entire White House (breath) Let me be clear, the violence we saw yesterday at our nation’s capitol was appalling, reprehensible and antithetical to the American way (breath) We condemn it, the President and this administration in the strongest possible terms (breath) It is unacceptable (breath) and those that broke the law should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law...blah blah blah unimportant-shit blah blah...
... the violence ... was appalling ... We condemn it — the President and this administration — in the strongest possible terms ...
If a speech writer wanted an explanatory phrase (contained within two m-dashes) to be understood correctly, it would have been written:
... the violence ... was appalling ... We—the President and this administration—condemn it in the strongest possible terms ...
But McEnany read it as if it had been written:
... the violence ... was appalling ... We condemn it, the president, and the administration, in the strongest possible terms ...
Deputy Press Secretary's write press releases. It's unknown who wrote this wondrous kerfuffle, however, Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Matthews submitted her resignation during the turmoil of these events with her own statement: As someone who worked in the halls of Congress I was deeply disturbed by what I saw today. I’ll be stepping down from my role, effective immediately.
Definition of toady: In French, flagorneuse /-r; a sycophant; a person who grovels/attempts to please for personal gain. Toady is also a common misspelling of the word today.
Dear careful reader: (who might-still be holding last month's portmanteau essay in the forefront of your mind) did you wonder why I provided the french word(s) to help define toady? If so—did you try to sound-it-out? Flagorneuse [feminine form; drop-e-add-r for masculine form] flag or neuse, flag or noose . . . the Trump-instigated domestic terrorists carried many different flags and they built a platform with a noose on the capitol grounds (reportedly, to hang Vice President Pence). Five people died. One of the dead carried the Don't Tread On Me flag as she marched to the US Capitol and later died of injuries sustained by being crushed under-foot by her fellow insurrectionists (which is a much more succinct example of irony than my "I survived shirt" essay, from last month). Allegedly, another terrorist died of a heart attack after a taser discharged in his front pants pocket while he was struggling to steal a portrait off a wall (which sounds too convoluted to be true; but self-tased testicles is funny, even though it's not irony).
more vocabulary essays: